Million Dollar Babies (New York Times / PDNPulse)
Maybe you wouldn’t pay a few million for those exclusive first pix of J.Lo’s twins. But magazine execs say they’re willing to shell out some serious dough for celebrity baby photos so that their titles are “known as the place to go for those pictures” and to keep competitors from nabbing them. “The consumer’s expectation is if the photos are going to be available, I’m going to see them in People,” Paul Caine, People’s publisher, told The New York Times. “If we don’t get them, we miss that brand promise, we lose the halo that goes with that.” Still, says OK! editor Sarah Ivens, shelling out thousands—or millions—for celebrity photos can be a gamble, so magazine executives must trust their guts.
J-Schools’ Flashes From The Past (ClickZ / Digital Journalist / min / Contra Costa Times via Romenesko)
In newsrooms, “do or die” is the mantra when it comes to multimedia. But as Vin Crosbie has discovered while teaching multimedia at Syracuse University’s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications, most journalism professors continue to cling to the past when teaching students the tricks of the trade. Even if they did focus more on multimedia, though, there’d be no guarantees for students entering the newspaper industry today. The Colorado Springs Gazette invested a lot of money to train photojournalist David Bitton to shoot video, and yet, for all of his training and enthusiasm, Bitton was laid off, along with 25 percent of the Gazette’s newsroom staff. “Layoffs can hit anyone in this industry and at any time,” Bitton writes in the latest issue of the Digital Journalist. Also: At least one journalist is hoping that MTV’s reality show The Paper will make newspapers hip again. Also: Even if newspapers are struggling, George Janson, the managing partner and director of print for mediaedge:cia, isn’t buying doomsday predictions about magazines.
Do Photo Retouchers Know When To Say ‘When’? (Newsweek / Huffington Post)
Here’s the least surprising news of the week: from brides to men’s and women’s magazines, everyone is retouching photos. And while this may be the norm, Newsweek’s Jessica Bennett thinks it’s a dangerous one for young women who aspire to imitate the models they see in magazines. Also: While Bennett argues that retouching has predates the digital era, artist Kimberly Brooks thinks that photography has undergone a sex change during the last decade, thanks to Photoshop. Whereas “The rather masculine act of capturing or ‘shooting’ a moment (‘the hunt’) with a sound subject and composition has evolved into one where the real art comes in the editing, not the capturing,” she writes. “The photographer, like a woman putting on make up at her vanity before going out for the evening, edits reality: the best features and colors are enhanced and sharpened, and a new, hyper-realistic art form, with a nod to surrealism of last century, is born. Not that Brooks thinks all photo manipulation is bad. She recently interviewed photog Tom Chambers about his “Prom Dress” series, in which he “practices his craft in Photoshop to a haunting hyper-realistic extreme that warrants close attention,” says Brooks.
MORE BELOW: Picturing photography's future? ... How does your salary compare? ...